>
Menu
Log in
Log in




  • February 06, 2026 9:11 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Creating the Intercultural Field: Legacies from the Pioneers offers a rare and intimate look at the origins of intercultural studies through first-person reflections from twelve foundational figures in the field, including distinguished contributors—Nancy J. Adler, Clifford Clarke, John Condon, Carlos Cortes, Alvino Fantini, Sandra Fowler, Robert Hayles, Stephen Rhinesmith, Fanchon Silberstein, Donna Stringer, Sivasailam Thiagarajan, and Michael Tucker whose work helped shape interculturalism as we know it today. Each contributor shares the formative experiences that influenced their thinking, practice, and long-term commitment to intercultural work.

    Through these personal narratives, the book reveals how an interdisciplinary field emerged at the intersection of anthropology, psychology, communication, education, and related disciplines. The stories illuminate the intellectual roots of intercultural theory and practice while offering inspiration and perspective for educators, practitioners, and scholars engaged in advancing intercultural competence today.

    This book was written by interculturalists for interculturalists. It is not just for interculturalists because fairly early in its develoment interculturalism embraced DEI concepts, theories and practices. Each person’s story told in their own words is interesting and informative by itself. However, reading all the stories reveals the mosaic of the intercultural field origins.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The flyer below describes how to order this book and get a 20% discount. Order from Springer and use the PALAUT code.

    Although a scholarly book, it was conceived and written with joy and enthusiasm by all involved. We hope that this shines through for you as you meet the pioneers.

    2026 JAN ISSUE Pioneer Flyer_978-3-032-01370-5.pdf

  • February 06, 2026 9:01 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    By Chris Cartwright, Tessa Sutton, 2026 Conference Co-Chairs 

    Thanks to all of you who participated in the SIETAR USA conference this past November. You joined us both online and in person with open minds, open hearts, and a spirit of grace and goodwill—the hallmarks of a SIETAR gathering. As we read the post-conference evaluations and listened to the testimonials offered in the SIETAR Coffee Hour Webinar in December, we are deeply humbled by your response and the reported impact of this endeavor.

    The conference planning team viewed the theme, “Inclusive Interculturalism: Purpose, Possibilities, and Progress,” as an opportunity to reframe what a conference could be and to embrace the challenge of being a truly inclusive event. We recognized that broader political, economic, and social conditions were affecting our field and our members’ experiences. As a result, fostering a shared sense of belonging across the diverse perspectives and experiences within our membership became a central focus.

    The conference was intentionally designed to inspire, build awareness, and foster connection—equipping participants to sustain shared work, identify supportive people and processes, and connect with colleagues who can share the responsibility of complex work.

    Stacie Walton and Marcia Bonato Warren preceded us as conference co-chairs and later stepped away from their roles for personal and professional reasons. In doing so, they entrusted us with the overall conference theme and a set of thoughtfully designed presentation tracks that opened meaningful avenues for engagement across areas of our work that are often siloed.

    • Inclusive Interculturalism in the environment, communities or field(s) we serve.
    • Inclusive Interculturalism within the organizations we serve
    • Inclusive Interculturalism within ourselves and the individuals we serve

    Interculturalists often (but not exclusively) prefer to focus on global cultural differences within the sector they serve. They often (but not exclusively) start their interventions at the individual (self, dyad, or triad) or small-cohort level and rarely initiate at the system-wide level.

    The diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) specialist often (again, but not exclusively) tends to prefer to focus on social justice issues within a narrow context (region, community, organization, etc.) in whatever sector they serve. They also often (again, but not exclusively) start their intervention engagement at the system and possibly cohort levels, and rarely initiate at the individual (self, dyad, or triad) level.

    NOTE: These are broad generalizations. There are many examples of interculturalists who address social justice issues at the local level and are skilled at systems-level interventions. Just as there are DEIB professionals who work globally and are skilled at the individual (self, dyad, or triad) interventions.

    We framed the conference program around purpose, possibilities, and progress in inclusive interculturalism. We then placed and sequenced presentations within their tracks that encouraged presenters and participants to engage with intercultural and DEIB perspectives and to learn from one another across sectors and intervention levels. This approach helped cultivate a broader and more inclusive sense of belonging.

    Thank you to Marcia and Stacie for these thoughtful constructs, and to our dedicated program team and volunteers for co-constructing such a rich buffet of SIETAR engagement options - they worked wonderfully well! From the highly interactive welcoming session, the long breaks, the dine-around arrangements, morning wellness activities, the pre-conference cultural tours of Portland, and the genuine conviviality of our participants. A unique opportunity in this year’s conference was the hosting of the Intercultural Communication Institute (ICI) Reunion. It was a delightful evening of shared closure and celebration of an agency that launched many of our careers in this field and supported many others in refining and growing their competencies in this field.

    Intentional instructional design and purposeful planning are only as good as the outcomes for conference participants. Here are a few of the quotes we have received:

    “I have been to this conference in the past, and had a good experience, but this one was intentional in every way. There was a curated space for authentic connection…I see myself here.” — Aqueelah Roberson

    “The energy and planning were amazing … Tamara’s keynote was a wake-up call to the need for accountability in our work.” — Liesbeth Huysmans

    “This was the first SIETAR conference I’ve presented at, and I felt so supported. This was the most inclusive place I’ve ever been—bar none! I was never alone, never unseen; it was a truly openhearted space.” — Beth Barich

    “Daniel Yalowitz’s session piqued my intellectual curiosity deeply … Donna Beegle’s session inspired me to watch several videos of her work on YouTube … we need to carry this energy forward.” — Stephen Henderson

    “The conference was perfect, including the glitches. … It was hard to choose sessions; there was such richness in the offerings. I appreciated the modeling of the Silent Auction items (such fun!), Milton’s framework on how to deal with the craziness of authoritarianism—offered with detached emotion—and Ernie and Cheryl’s insights about inclusion in different countries around the world.” — Kathy Ellis

    “The session from the presenters at Prepa Tech in Mexico opened my mind to the dream of having a curriculum for youth that is truly integrative! … This conference was a transformational moment for me.” — Aliona Yermalayeva

    “Proud to join honest self examination in our field: are we missing something?  Appreciated Beegle’s focus on poverty as culture, Dickinson’s focus on “intercultural” not just “international”, and grateful to find welcome for myself and others online.”— Cassie Quinlan

    “The first session on Listening Circles set the tone for my engagement. I met some wonderful new people and changed my plans on which sessions to attend based on seeing the program through their eyes. The young participants from Mexico were remarkable—thank you for arranging for them to attend and present. … The whole event was thoughtfully constructed and embraced belonging.” — Kim Brown

    "[My faith in] humanity has been restored after coming to the SIETAR USA conference." — Allison Iurato

    Hosting a conference in the United States focused on inclusive interculturalism at this moment presented challenges on many levels. Yet we remain deeply convinced that this shared work is needed now more than ever as we navigate increasingly complex times. Reframing a conference with the strong history and tradition of SIETAR USA is not easy—change requires intention, courage, and care.

    Our hope is that this conference offered a space for inspiration, awareness, and connection. More importantly, we invite you to carry what you learned into action—to apply insights in your organizations, classrooms, communities, and relationships, and to continue advancing inclusive interculturalism through thoughtful practice and collaboration. Progress happens when learning moves beyond the conference and into daily work, sustained by connection and shared responsibility.

    Thank you for being part of this collective effort and for contributing to the future we are building together. 

    With Love and Respect,

    Tessa Sutton and Chris Cartwright 

    If you missed the conference, the ICI Event and/or the follow up Coffee Hour and would like to know more, or to find out about access to conference materials or recordings, please inquire at info@sietarusa.org with the subject line “SIETAR USA 2025 Conference Materials Inquiry” with your specific areas of interest.

    Scenes from the Conference


  • February 06, 2026 8:55 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    By Michele Villagran

    Culturally Competent Research for Library and Information Science (CCRLIS) is a multi-year research project launched in 2025 to examine how researchers in Library and Information Studies (LIS) conceptualize and operationalize cultural competence within research contexts. The project emerges from a recognized imbalance in the field: while cultural competence has been extensively addressed in LIS professional practice—particularly in service delivery, access, and community engagement—it has not been equivalently theorized or systematically embedded within research processes. CCRLIS addresses this gap by foregrounding cultural competence as a methodological and ethical dimension of LIS research rather than a peripheral or post hoc consideration.

    The study focuses on two primary research questions: (1) How do LIS researchers incorporate cultural competence into research team formation and across the research lifecycle? and (2) What criteria do LIS researchers identify as essential for conducting culturally competent research? To address these questions, CCRLIS draws on survey and interview data collected from members of the American Library Association and the Association for Library and Information Science Educators. These participants represent a range of roles, including researchers, educators, and practitioners whose work both produces and applies LIS research.

    Conceptualizing Cultural Competence in Research Contexts

    Within CCRLIS, cultural competence in research is defined as the capacity of research teams to design and conduct rigorous, ethical inquiry that explicitly recognizes and respects the cultural identities, social positions, and contextual realities of the populations under study. This definition situates cultural competence as an active, iterative research practice rather than a static attribute. It encompasses the whole research process, including question formulation, methodological design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination. A core component of this is intercultural competency, understood as the ability to engage effectively and appropriately across culturally diverse contexts. In research settings, intercultural competency requires more than awareness of difference; it involves adapting research practices to acknowledge distinct communication norms, epistemologies, and values. CCRLIS participants emphasized that such competency must be intentionally cultivated, particularly in research involving historically marginalized or underrepresented communities.

    The LIS profession has long articulated commitments to multiculturalism, diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly in the context of service provision. Librarians have historically emphasized equitable access to information, respectful engagement with diverse user populations, and the development of collections and programs that reflect a multiplicity of cultural perspectives. However, CCRLIS findings indicate that comparable attention has not consistently been given to research practices. Although cultural competence has increasingly informed professional training and service models, formalized guidance for culturally competent research design and implementation remains limited within LIS. This absence has methodological and ethical consequences. When cultural assumptions remain implicit or unexamined, research risks reproducing dominant epistemologies and embedding unrecognized bias into data collection instruments, analytic frameworks, and interpretive conclusions. Such bias can influence both the validity of research findings and their application in practice.

    Positioning Cultural Competence as a Research Imperative

    CCRLIS explicitly positions cultural competence as integral to research quality and ethical responsibility. The project seeks to support LIS researchers and practitioners by articulating research practices that move beyond surface-level inclusion toward deeper intercultural engagement. Importantly, CCRLIS emphasizes that culturally competent research is not limited to studies explicitly focused on culture or identity; rather, it is relevant across research domains and methodological approaches. By centering cultural competence within research processes, CCRLIS advances a view of research as relational and situated. This perspective challenges assumptions of researcher neutrality and instead highlights how research is shaped by the identities, institutional positions, and cultural frameworks of those who conduct it.

    Participant-Identified Research Practices

    Participants identified multiple applied research contexts in which culturally competent practices are particularly salient, including community needs assessments, program evaluations, collection development studies, and user experience research in public, school, and special libraries. In these settings, research findings often inform resource allocation, service design, and institutional priorities, amplifying the ethical stakes of methodological decisions. One participant described culturally competent research practices as extending beyond participant recruitment and data collection to include research team dynamics, analytic decision-making, and post-project reflection. This holistic view underscores that cultural competence must be sustained throughout the research lifecycle rather than confined to discrete stages.

    CCRLIS participants offered specific examples of how cultural competence can be operationalized in research practice. One frequently cited practice involved allowing research participants to self-identify rather than selecting from predetermined demographic categories. This approach was described as acknowledging the complexity and fluidity of identity while resisting reductive classification schemes. Participants also emphasized the importance of explicitly recognizing the identities and social positions of both researchers and participants. Such acknowledgment was described as essential for understanding how power dynamics shape research interactions, data interpretation, and participant engagement. This orientation aligns with broader principles of intercultural research that emphasize transparency and positional awareness.

    Several participants highlighted the need to build sustained relationships with communities, particularly when working with Indigenous or otherwise marginalized populations. Trust, respect, and attention to cultural protocols and historical contexts were identified as prerequisites for ethical engagement. These practices were described as foundational to both community connection and research integrity.

    Framework Development and Key Criteria

    Based on survey and interview data, CCRLIS has identified nine key criteria for culturally competent research. These criteria collectively form the basis of a new framework grounded in practitioner and researcher perspectives. While the framework is not prescriptive, it emphasizes the interrelated roles of skill development, cultural awareness, and humility in navigating diverse information practices.

    A central theme across participant responses was the importance of reflecting on the researcher's positionality and professional identity. Participants described how cultural background, institutional affiliation, and professional title influence research questions, methodological choices, and interpretive authority. This reflection was framed as an ongoing practice rather than a one-time disclosure. Multiple participants recommended collaborative research models in which community members are engaged as co-researchers or invited to participate in data analysis and peer review processes. These approaches were described as mechanisms for redistributing interpretive authority and ensuring that research findings are culturally grounded.

    Participants also raised ethical questions related to narrative ownership, including who should tell particular stories and when researchers should step back from authorship or leadership roles. One participant noted that analytic codes were sometimes revised when cultural idioms or values altered the meaning of data. Such practices illustrate how ethicscan shape methodological decisions in culturally competent research.

    Ongoing Development

    The relevance of cultural competence extends across disciplinary boundaries, allowing the CCRLIS framework to be adapted for use beyond LIS. Although CCRLIS deliverables are not tailored to specific institutions or communities, they are designed to be flexible and responsive to local contexts. In 2026, Villagran will collaborate with intercultural experts to revise the framework and develop an open-access course on culturally competent research. This course will provide structured tools, resources, a workbook, and applied activities to support researchers in integrating culturally competent practices into their work. Those interested in contributing feedback or staying informed about CCRLIS developments are encouraged to engage through the project form.

    Michele A. L. Villagran is an associate professor at San José State University School of Information, where her research focuses on diversity and social justice in library and information science and cultural intelligence phenomena within libraries. Villagran is also the CEO of CulturalCo, LLC, focusing on cultural competence, cultural intelligence, conflict management, and diversity consulting. Involved with numerous associations, including REFORMA, the Association for Library and Information Science Educators (ALISE), and the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. She is the recipient of the 2023 American Library Association Social Responsibilities Round Table Herb Biblo Outstanding Leadership Award for Social Justice and Equality, the 2021 REFORMA Librarian of the Year, and the 2021 ALISE Norman Horrocks Leadership Award.

  • February 06, 2026 8:46 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    By Kathy Ellis and SIETAR USA Poets

    We recently tried this community-poem exercise in a poetry group I belong to. It was fun, it brought us closer together, and it was surprisingly moving to hear my own line woven into the whole when the poem was read aloud. So, I thought—why not SIETAR?

    Poetry is often misunderstood or undervalued. It can make us anxious: What does it mean? How do I read this aloud? Can I write a poem of my own? But for many, poetry and spoken word resonate deeply. They make great icebreakers, and even a few lines can open a presentation or spark a meaningful discussion.

    With that in mind, I titled the community poem and wrote the first two lines to help set a tone and direction for the SIETAR community. Throughout the Poster Session, I invited attendees to add a line or two and to remain nameless for less stress.      Over the course of two days, we gathered 35 lines from more than 10 contributors. 

    Once all the lines were in, I shaped and formatted the final poem.

    A Community Poem

    SIETAR Conference 2025 Facilitated by Kathy Ellis
    Inclusive Interculturalism: Purpose, Possibilities, and Progress
    By SIETAR Poets

    The same stars shine on everyone.
    We walk the dust in the same world,
    we stand in the rain.
    Context is everything.
    Three deep nourishing breaths and
    relax into expansive areas of inclusion.

    Familiar streets, but foreign skies.
    Home feels like a borrowed guise.
    The love is real, the touch is kind but
    I can’t rewind what changed inside.
    A silence within that keeps all that’s in me 
    What a world this would be.
    If you could see all we can give 
    Listen, listen to the silence in me.
    What do you hear?
    What would you like to ask?
    I hear sounds of generations before and after me,
    familiar and foreign music.

    My heart to your heart,
    this is what it’s all about.
    With purpose, possibilities, progress,
    let us be!
    Birds of different feathers, flocking together.
    Lean in con juicy delicious ambiguity, sonrisas y preguntas.
    It’s all about human connections.
    Building together.
    Challenge white supremacy.
    Culture is everything and,
    everyone, let’s come together
     in hope, love and peace.

    You be you,
    unzipping the rawness.
    The truth in tears.
    Adapt but stay authentic and
    true to your values.

  • February 06, 2026 8:33 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    As we publish this early 2026 edition of SIETAR USA Connect, we find ourselves at a meaningful moment of transition, and our new Board of Directors will be announced very soon. In the meantime, please join me in acknowledging the four outgoing Board Members for their service to SIETAR USA:

    • Cheryl Woehr,  Conference Oversight Director and Professional Development Director
    • Elmer Dixon President and Immediate Past-President,
    • Kwesi Ewoodzie, Local Groups Director
    • Sandy Fowler, Communications Director

    In this issue of SIETAR USA Connect, I would like to highlight Sandy Fowler for her many years of service on the SIETAR USA Board of Directors and thank her for stepping in as interim Communications Director. As Sandy notes in her personal letter below, her history with SIETAR is extensive, dating back to SIETAR’s earliest days. From her time as President of both SIETAR International and SIETAR USA, to co-chairing several of our conferences, to her work on this latest version of our newsletter, her devotion to the intercultural field and this organization is a testament to the volunteer spirit that sustains us. It is the collaboration between our seasoned pioneers like Sandy and our emerging leaders that ensures our organization doesn't just survive, but thrives.

    SIETAR USA is grateful for Sandy’s years of leadership and hard work, and we look forward to her continued presence with our organization and our community. Our history is enriched because of the foundation that she has helped us build, and our path forward is ensured by the resilience and perseverance of our inclusive community.

     - Sue Shinomiya, President, Board of Directors, SIETAR USA

    Gratitude As I Leave the SIETAR USA Board of Directors and the Communications Portfolio…

    As I depart from the SIETAR USA Board of Directors, I would like to express my gratitude to all the many people over the decades who have shared my devotion to SIETAR. Without us, the organization would likely not have survived.

    SIETAR USA continues to foster intercultural learning, dialogue, and connection across communities and professions. I like to think that my efforts since 1979 helped enable us to sustain our programs, strengthened our network, and created spaces where diverse perspectives are valued and shared. Serving as president of both SIETAR International and SIETAR USA, was the honor of a lifetime.

    Serving as the Communications Director for the past two years, I offer deep appreciation to the Communications Committee who helped me produce an informational newsletter containing news plus scholarly articles over the past two years. Colleagues Brianna Harrison, Deborah Orlowski, Neal Goodman, Aliona Yermayaleva, and Rob Pusch were my companions in this enterprise. I also offer huge thanks to Melissa Neu who formats the newsletter and without whom it would not be as professional or appealing.

    The SIETAR community was conceived as a forum where educators, trainers, and researchers could share ideas and move the intercultural and DEI fields forward. It is where you find likeminded people to learn from and enjoy. That is what I found at conferences, webinars, other events—and most of all, the time I spent on the Board. I will continue to be actively involved with SIETAR USA in a capacity yet to be determined.

    - Sandra M. Fowler

  • October 16, 2025 9:07 PM | Rob Pusch

    By Aliona Yermalayeva,
    International Correspondent

    “We are certainly in the midst of a rich and rewarding SIETAR season”, shared Moutushi Künne, the President of Young SIETAR, in their October newsletter “New Icebergs, New Insights”. We wholeheartedly agree and are excited to present recent updates and upcoming events from the global SIETAR community.

    SIETAR Europa & Young SIETAR: Virtual Institute and Film Festival

    September was highlighted by the 3rd Virtual Institute followed by the Virtual Film Festival (SEVIFEST), hosted by SIETAR Europa and Young SIETAR. Participants of the Virtual Institute engaged in master classes, keynotes, and panel discussions exploring interculturality, identity, and human rights through the lens of cinema. The festival, meanwhile, featured a carefully curated selection of films dedicated to raising awareness about social, cultural, and human rights issues.

    We’re happy to share insights from Planning Team member Tamara Thorpe and Closing Ceremony facilitator Bernd Gibson:

    Tamara Thorpe

    “SEU Virtual Institute 2025 had some thrilling momentum from our first 2 Virtual Institutes, with returning and new attendees. All 3 Master Classes were full and led by incredible Guest Speakers and Moderators who were both new and longtime members and contributors. The Virtual Institute Planning Team was pleased with how eager they were to facilitate intensive and immersive learning experiences tackling the complexities of our work in today’s VUCA world. 

    Partnering with Young SIETAR made this SEU Virtual Institute more memorable and age inclusive and also provided the program planning and implementation with much needed additional resources and support. With the leadership of their new president, Moutushi Künne, we anticipate great opportunities in coming years for Young SIETARians.
    This year, in lieu of a closing Keynote, Bernd Gibson facilitated a powerful group reflection bring together participants from all 3 Master Class tracks to reflect, share and connect on our learning and growth. This session facilitated a deeper integration of folks learning and strengthening of our community.”

    At the closing ceremony I facilitated activities that allowed participants and speakers from all tracks to connect on a more personal/human level first and then share learnings, reflections and open questions from the tracks they followed. 

    The non-verbal highlight was a silent activity we called Virtual Kalavata, with reference to the opening keynote by Heather Horst on indigenous practices and technology. All participants had to find objects or pieces of clothing and show them to the camera, until all the objects were aligned. After a few minutes of silent negotiations, we all ended up holding coloured pens in our hands. A beautiful moment of community.”

    Bernd Gibson:

    “I was honoured to host the opening and closing ceremony at the Virtual Institute this year and to follow the Education Track as a participant. 

    At the closing ceremony I facilitated activities that allowed participants and speakers from all tracks to connect on a more personal/human level first and then share learnings, reflections and open questions from the tracks they followed. 

    The non-verbal highlight was a silent activity we called Virtual Kalavata, with reference to the opening keynote by Heather Horst on indigenous practices and technology. All participants had to find objects or pieces of clothing and show them to the camera, until all the objects were aligned. After a few minutes of silent negotiations, we all ended up holding coloured pens in our hands. A beautiful moment of community.”

    SIETAR Japan: 40th Anniversary Conference

    SIETAR Japan hosted a milestone event in Tokyo on October 11-12thIts 40th Anniversary Annual Conference was dedicated to “Intercultural Communication and Peace-Making Efforts”. 

    Our own SIETAR USA President Sue Shinomiya, joined the Keynote Panel. Together with Patricia Malidor Coleman (former SIETAR USA President) and Marie-Therese Claes (of SIETAR SE Asia) she led a crucial discussion “What can we interculturalists do in challenging times  - Action steps towards a peaceful future”.

    Newsletters: New Icebergs, New Insights: October with Young SIETAR

    Check out the October newsletter from Young SIETAR which features:

    Webinars: 

    Get ready for the following featured webinars hosted by our global chapters!

    October 21, SIETAR Poland

    This webinar hopes to share some of the history and culture of Polish-Americans to a wider audience, and especially towards those not only in Poland but other members of Polonia. It is also for those interested in diaspora and migration studies. 

    Facilitated by Stephen Satkiewicz, a third generation Polish-American who is deeply enthusiastic about his heritage, and hopes to create stronger ties between Poland and Polonia. 

    October 25, SIETAR France (in collaboration with IESEG Center for Intercultural Engagement and Child Rights in Action Asia)

    This interactive workshop explores how intercultural collaboration can strengthen collective action toward gender equity and social impact.

    Facilitated by Aditi Salkar, a global social impact strategist specializing in gender equity, humanitarian programs, and child rights.

    November 4, SIETAR Switzerland

    Culturally Adaptive Healthcare Access: A Project ECHO Case Study

    This webinar explores how culturally adaptive approaches can reduce barriers and improve healthcare outcomes for historically underserved communities. Drawing on lessons learned from a study of 62 Project ECHO programs in the United States and Canada, we’ll examine how healthcare practitioners and advocates can meet patients where they are – by honouring cultural perspectives, addressing systemic inequities, and fostering authentic engagement.

    Facilitated by Nagesh Rao, professor of Social Medicine at the Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio. 

    For more events from SIETAR Europa please visit their Global Events Calendar

    Global Conference Calendar:

    The coming weeks offer numerous opportunities to connect with the SIETAR community in person!

    SIETAR South East Asia Conference will be held November 7-9th with the theme of “Intercultural Insights for Thriving in Asia”, to be co-hosted by Kasetsart Business School, Bangkok, Thailand.  

    We look forward to seeing many of you on November 11-15th in Portland, Oregon, for the 2025 SIETAR USA Conference “Inclusive Interculturalism: Purpose, Possibilities, and Progress”.

    SIETAR Deutschland FORUM 2025 will delve into “Interculturality in Transition: Insights, Inspiration, Perspectives” on November 13-15th in Erfurt, Germany.

    Hybrid International Congress “Intercultural Negotiation" will take place on November 13-15th in Montpellier, France.

    As always, we encourage you to explore what else other SIETAR Global groups have to offer. For more information, please feel free to reach out to Sue Shinomiya – our point of contact for SIETAR Global. 

    Stay connected and continue building bridges with us!

  • October 16, 2025 8:38 PM | Rob Pusch

    Republished post by Bill Kelly

    Bill Kelly knows that understanding the history of the people with whom we are communicating. His book on that subject, A New World Arising: Culture and Political Economy in Japanese, Chinese, Indian, and Islamic Civilizations was in 2024. This year his new book, Reinventing Japan: Facing the West and Creating New Selves appeared. In his new book he gives in some detail what we need to know about people with a very different history and culture from ours. Kelly says, “It is for a general audience rather than an academic one, but I think it provides the material from which teaching and training points can be drawn.”  

    HOW JAPANESE PEOPLE HAVE REINVENTED THEMSELVES IN MODERN TIMES

    Japanese people have viewed themselves very differently at different times during the modern era. These shifts in identity have been responses to living in a Western world. There have been periods in which they identified with the West, followed by efforts to distinguish themselves positively from Western people. Before World War II, many sympathized with ultranationalism. From the 1960s through the 1980s, people sacrificed to create the most powerful economy in the world. In the twenty-first century, Japanese popular culture has been a source of national pride.

    The first two trends were reactions to Western dominance. But the most recent identity has come about because a non-Western culture has had a huge impact on the rest of the world for the first time. As Western domination weakens, new identities can arise that are neither for nor against the West. Japanese people have been capitalizing on this opportunity, although it is still a time of transition, as older identities linger.

    A knowledge of Japan’s modern history is essential for understanding how Japanese people view themselves today. I will describe Japan’s experience with Western imperialism beginning in 1853 and how it has affected people’s image of themselves and the world. I will also discuss the new beginnings that are possible today, as the modern world experiences various crises and new configurations of power arise.

    Patterns of Japanese Identity Creation

    Commodore Perry’s black ships arrived in 1853. After more than 200 years of almost complete isolation from the rest of the world, Japan was suddenly forced to join a world where the West made the rules. The leaders felt continual pressure to show that the Japanese were a civilized people; otherwise, they would be colonized. Western eyes were continually upon them, looking for faults.

    Modern Japanese identity has largely taken shape in response to this Western intrusion. There have been two cycles; the first lasted from 1868 to 1945, and the second began at the end of World War II, lasting until about 1990. These cycles were remarkably similar.

    First, Japan adopts Western values and institutions, while rejecting much of its cultural heritage. As the country gathers strength, a backlash against Western influence arises. The leaders feel motivated to take a new look at the Japanese past. They view Japan’s success as the result of the excellence of Japanese traditional values, not due to skillfully imitating the West. Japanese people expect that their success will be recognized by those whom they used to look up to. When this doesn’t happen, nationalism gains ground.

    The First Cycle

    Japanese identity underwent radical changes during the transition to a modern state. After the West forced Japan to open its doors to foreign trade, the goal was to protect Japan’s independence. It had to quickly become a wealthy and powerful nation to defend itself. Western ways were idealized during this period of “Civilization and Enlightenment” (1868-1890). Yukichi Fukuzawa was the leading promoter of westernization, advocating liberty, equality, and rationality as the key sources of the West’s power. He opposed Confucianism, blaming it for Japan’s weakness. Although celebrating science and democracy, he was a nationalist who resented Western imperialism.

    Around 1890, the pendulum swung back. Confucian values were revived, and a conservative outlook prevailed. The emperor was revered not only as the symbol of a unified Japanese nation but also as the head of state. However, the clock could not be easily turned back, as Western values had already spread. The early twentieth-century novelist Natsume Soseki, in his essay “My Individualism,” rejected a feudal outlook in favor of individualism, yet acknowledged that Western-style individualism can often lead to selfish behavior. He proposed that we accept others’ individuality while taking on the responsibilities and duties that accompany freedom.

    New cultural developments also took place, as more people moved to the cities. There was greater openness to Western influences in architecture, literature, the arts, and fashion. The urban middle class shared the energy and enthusiasm of the 1920s, feeling part of the larger (Western) world. Many combined Japanese and Western lifestyles. 

    However, the Great Depression intervened, signaling the end of the party. The capitalist West was in decline, unsure of its direction and losing its optimism and confidence. Japanese nationalists wanted to drive the Western colonizers out of Asia so they could build the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. Their aggressive foreign policy led to war.

    Ultranationalist themes dominated the media, and the Japanese spirit of self-sacrifice and simple living was celebrated. Nationalists claimed that Japanese traditional culture, rooted in spirituality and aesthetics, was the source of Japan’s strength. The West, despite its advanced technology, was no match for the Japanese spirit.

    The Quaker Inazo Nitobe, author of Bushido: The Soul of Japan, was Japan’s foremost internationalist of the 1920s and a high official in the League of Nations. However, he supported the Japanese army’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and its subsequent withdrawal from the League. In his view, Japan, a leading nation, had a right to its sphere of influence, similar to Western imperialist powers.

    The Second Cycle

    Japan became an integral part of global capitalism under the US military umbrella after the defeat in World War II. It was politically subordinate to the US, while concentrating on recovering from the war and developing economically. Early postwar intellectuals promoted the development of individual autonomy and the establishment of democratic institutions, led by the historian Masao Maruyama. Well-known for his analysis of ultranationalism, he was a leader of the 1960 AMPO protests against the renewal of the US-Japan Security Treaty. People had little taste for helping the US to contain communism in Asia if it meant a rapid military buildup.

    As the Japanese economy became the world’s strongest in the 1980s, the United States stopped being Japan’s model. It was even said that Europe would become Japan’s boutique and the US would grow its food. Japan’s relations with the West in the 1980s recall the 1920s, when Japan was not treated with respect, despite its economic development. In the 1980s, Japan was criticized as an unfair trader and for failing to practice capitalism like the US. As in the 1920s, there were racial overtones. Many people supported economic nationalism and celebrated the uniqueness of Japanese culture.

    During this high-flying era, Japan’s economic success was said to stem from traditional values such as diligence, racial homogeneity, and an emphasis on relationships. These traits were contrasted with American self-indulgence, racial diversity, and individualism. “Internationalization” became the buzzword, since it was necessary to communicate with the rest of the world that was buying its cars and consumer electronics. Isolation was no longer an option.

    Akio Morita and Shintaro Ishihara, co-authors of The Japan That Can Say No, were two high-profile figures of this era. Despite sharing a nationalist outlook, they had quite different approaches. Morita, the founder of Sony, argued that Japanese business practices were superior and that US criticisms of Japan were not valid; however, Japan should also make greater efforts to contribute to world governance. Ishihara’s tone was far harsher and belligerent. He emphasized US racism, in particular, the atomic bombings. He asserted that Japan ought to acquire nuclear weapons and replace the US as the leading power. The gloves were off.

    The “Lost Decades”

    Since the collapse of the “bubble economy” at the end of the 1980s, economic growth has been sluggish, especially when compared with the three previous decades. This period has been termed the “lost decades.”  Yet, much has been gained. Popular culture has become a source of pride in the twenty-first century. Japan is known abroad for its comics, animation, video games, toys, fashion, and food, and applauded for its “national cool.” Haruki Murakami, the writer, and Hayao Miyazaki, the creator of animated films, are recognizable faces of Japan, helping to close the gap between Japanese and international tastes.

    Japan’s reluctance to permit immigration is a holdover from the past. Such resistance continues despite the clear need for foreign labor due to a shrinking population. Japan is often viewed as insular; yet, foreign visitors praise the country’s safety, efficiency, courtesy, and service. These positive qualities are the product of a weakening but attractive emphasis on the group rather than the individual. Group-oriented societies tend to be less open to the outside; individualistic societies usually have a more inclusive outlook, but expect others to be like them.

    New Beginnings

    As the West loses its power and influence, Japanese identity is no longer threatened. Japanese people don’t need to see themselves as unique, which only means different from the West. The worldwide acceptance of Japanese popular culture means Japan contributes to the ways others think and feel; it does not just supply the products they consume.

    There is little reason for Japan to distinguish itself from the West by maintaining a collective orientation and relatively homogeneous society. We are living at a time when people can be individuals while highly valuing relationships with their communities. Japanese people can be cosmopolitan without losing their Japaneseness. Two contemporary examples of such a Japanese identity are Naomi Kawase and the Seikatsu Club Consumers’ Cooperative.

    The film director Naomi Kawase identifies both with Nara, where she grew up, and the world. She founded the Nara International Film Festival in 2010, staffed by volunteers and residents. Her goal is to help renew local communities and attract foreign people to Nara.

    The Seikatsu Club Consumers’ Cooperative was started by housewives in Tokyo in 1965 to provide safe food at affordable prices. By 2018, its membership had reached 400,000 nationwide, and it aims to build self-sufficient and environmentally sustainable communities. Although focusing on families and communities, it also faces outward, organizing trips to foreign countries to observe cooperatives, holding international symposiums, and exchanging ideas with like-minded groups abroad.

    Full Circle

    We have come full circle. In the 1880s, Yukichi Fukuzawa recommended that Japan “leave Asia.” Not long afterward, Taiwan and Korea were colonized, and, in the 1930s, China was invaded. Prejudice against Chinese and Korean people, not to mention other Asians, has long existed. Yet, there are signs of change as Korean dramas and popular music are loved by many. The old hierarchy with the West at the top, Japan in the middle, and Asia at the bottom is breaking down. Greater economic equality between many parts of Asia and Japan and the West has encouraged Japanese people to return to Asia.

    A look at Japan’s modern history shows that Japanese people share a fractured identity with all non-Western people, the result of Western imperialism and domination. Japan modernized far more quickly than other Asian nations, but its people also paid a high price. As Natsume Soseki pointed out, experiencing in several decades what the West experienced over centuries led to nervous exhaustion. Then, after the war, the burning desire to catch up with and surpass the West left little time for rest and relaxation, family life, contemplation, closeness to nature, and the pursuit of beauty.

    Now, Japan is no longer competing for either military or economic superiority. Unlike China, it is not mobilized to surpass the United States. It is building an identity based more on culture rather than military or economic power. Japan has greatly increased its military spending due to aggressive Chinese actions in the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands’ conflict and North Korean threats, but this is a largely defensive move.

    Japan may have chosen the road of soft power out of necessity, but there is much to be said for walking this road. An identity that is more open to the world is now within reach. People also have a great opportunity to appreciate nature, beauty, spirituality, and simple living more than previous generations. They can live a healthier and less work-centered life. The Japanese past offers much wisdom that can be put to good use today.

    Bill Kelly, 2025

    (Reprinted from Bill Kelly's substack with permission) 

  • October 16, 2025 8:25 PM | Rob Pusch

     By Neal Goodman

    Are you stressed by the reduced emphasis on globalization and DEI initiatives?  The article below provides two cases of cross-cultural and diversity training that take place outside the USA.  These cases can stimulate interest in training programs in and outside the US.  There are six additional shorter cases that exemplify (mostly) non US companies or training issues.  Please address any questions or comments to the author at their new email address Neal@NealGoodmanGroup.com 

    Going Global with Training and Development

    While the world may seem to be spinning out of control over divisive politics, a strong unseen undercurrent of training that builds respect and understanding is running through global organizations. These training interventions have unique challenges to overcome, but the results in improved productivity, profitability, trust, and respect among co-workers make tackling these challenges worthwhile.

    Let’s look at two case studies, one a German pharmaceutical company and the other a manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia, and see how they faced their diversity and inclusion challenges.

    CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING FOR 200 INTERNAL CONSULTANTS FOR A GERMAN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY

    Challenges: More than 200 savvy internal consultants from multiple countries were coming together in Germany for a one-day retreat, so they could get to know each other better and learn about cross-cultural differences within their teams and with regard to the global clients they support. HR wanted there to be multiple opportunities for the participants to meet in smaller groups so they could get to know each other better. The majority of the attendees were from Germany, and the training was to take place in English. A U.S.-based training organization was selected to deliver the training. The German hosts wanted to have a fun evening event to conclude the day, with all the attendees dressing up in costumes representing cultures other than their own. For example, the Germans would dress as Brazilians. However, the American participants said they would refuse to do this since it would lead to stereotyping and divisiveness rather than inclusion.

    Solutions: A U.S.-based training organization, which specializes in global team development and with prior global experience with this company, was selected to design and deliver the multicultural retreat. The training company assigned seven of its German-speaking and Germany-based trainers to assist in the design and delivery of the program. This eliminated the possibility that the training had underlying American cultural biases and prevented the impression that this was a U.S. program being imposed on a predominantly German audience. The only presentation made by an American was the keynote to kick off the retreat.

    Seven facilitators were selected, so the 200 participants could meet in smaller groups. The training methodology was almost exclusively interactive, with many opportunities for the participants to get to know each other and to share insights about their cultures. Case studies derived from the participants were used to illustrate cross-cultural challenges they face in their assignments. Participants shared their cultural profiles and discussed best practices to overcome the differences with each other.

    At the conclusion of the program, the participants wrote their key learnings on a 40-foot-long roll of paper and then walked around the list capturing each other’s ideas, which later were posted on the group’s Website. In consultation with the training organization, it was decided that the costume event was inappropriate and could be offensive, so the evening event was an elaborate dinner followed by a dance party.

    The success of the program was measured in part by the number of participants who identified colleagues from other countries as “buddies” and committed to stay in touch on a monthly basis to share ideas and experiences. Informal measures of success were the hundreds of key learnings from the program that were recorded, and the laughter and smiles of the participants.

    INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP AND DIVERSITY TRAINING IN SAUDI ARABIA

    Challenges: Saudi Arabia is committed to increasing the number of Saudi citizens employed in the economy, with a focus on non-energy-related industries. To achieve this objective—known as the Saudization program—foreign companies are being incentivized to open new manufacturing facilities in the kingdom. Due to historical factors, many Saudis have not had significant experience managing and leading the diverse workforce in Saudi Arabia. As a solution to this lack of experience, Western companies working in Saudi Arabia are offering cross-cultural and diversity training for their multicultural teams. Some of the unique diversity factors that must be addressed include: degree of religiosity (those more observant versus those who are less observant); nationality differences (both in regard to the many employees from Southeast Asia and the nationality of people from the Middle East); and discrimination by some, based on gender, sexual orientation, and those who are not Muslim.

    Solutions: A training program was designed to specifically address these topics in an open and non-confrontational manner. The process began with interviews with the current non-Saudi head of a new and expanding manufacturing facility, who identified six specific topics he wanted to address. Next, the HR leader for the region offered corporate mission statements regarding diversity and leadership competencies that the head of the facility would introduce at the start of the program. A trainer with more than 20 years’ experience working with leading Saudi organizations was selected to lead the training. Getting a respected trainer was critical since both the topic and the trainer (who is a Western woman) could be seen as “foreign” and not relevant to their situation. The training methodology combined instructor-led facilitation and interactive group activities to draw out and reinforce key learning points. A deliberate informal facilitation style encouraged inclusive participation.

    The result of the program was an increased openness to address the diversity issues being faced by the leaders and supervisors at the plant. All of the potentially disruptive topics were discussed openly and with respect for all. The leadership team and supervisors created specific action plans and milestones to be achieved. The success of the program was measured by the positive responses of the Saudi and non-Saudi attendees. In fact, the supervisors wanted to roll out the program to their employees.

    OTHER TRAINING EXAMPLES

    Here are other examples of recent diversity and cross-cultural interventions:

    1. A two-day cross-cultural strategy retreat for executives of a leading European biopharmaceutical company being bought by a major Korean chaebol on how to best integrate the cultures of the two organizations.

    2. Customized cross-cultural training for expats going to the U.S., France, Saudi Arabia, and Taiwan. Each family received its own program to address its specific needs.

    3. An unconscious bias training for a high-tech company in Malaysia focusing on the hidden aspects that impact successful relationships. Special concern was paid to the systemic differences found in Malaysian society between the three main ethnic groups: Malays, Chinese, and Indians.

    4. Training U.S. scientists to work with Japanese scientists on the impact of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in World War II. This training was meant to help the U.S. scientists understand the cultural underpinnings of Japanese society and workplace relationships to expedite working relationships.

    5. Teambuilding for Israeli and American technology teams. While both the Israelis and Americans had the necessary technical skills, their differences in communication styles were leading to mistrust and bad feelings. These common cultural differences were addressed in a non-threatening workshop featuring numerous simulations.

    6. Webinar series on working globally for the U.S. unit of a major Dutch chemical company that has a multicultural workforce and client base.

    While it may appear that those things that divide us are immutable, the reality is that organizations are seriously addressing these differences in order to build bridges of understanding.

    Please share your best practices and challenges when addressing differences with me at: ngoodman@global-dynamics.com.

    Neal Goodman, Ph.D., is president of Global Dynamics, Inc., a training and development firm specializing in globalization, cultural intelligence, effective virtual workplaces, and diversity and inclusion. He can be reached at 305.682.7883 and at ngoodman@globaldynamics.com. For more information, visit http://www.globaldynamics.com.

    (Reprinted from Training Magazine with permission) 

  • October 16, 2025 5:02 PM | Rob Pusch

    Dorothy Mealmaker Sermol, age 85, passed away peacefully at home on July 20, 2025, in Portland, Oregon, surrounded by her loving husband and family. Her life was devoted to kindness, understanding, and the teaching and advocacy of diversity in worldviews. In addition, she was a devoted lover of “pussy cats.”

    Dorothy was born in Glasgow, Scotland, to James and Marion “Minnie” Colville. She spent her childhood in Thornliebank, Ayr, and Greenock, and attended Greenock Academy. A gifted vocalist, she won numerous voice competitions and earned a full scholarship to the Royal Academy of Music and Dance, where she received her LRAM (Licentiate of the Royal Academy of Music).

    In 1965, following the death of her first husband, Dorothy emigrated to the United States with her two young daughters. She taught in private schools across the state of California including in Los Angeles, Palo Alto, San Mateo, and San Francisco. She later attended San Mateo College and then moved to Portland, Oregon, where she earned a BA in Intercultural Communication from Marylhurst College. Her passion for communication led her to pursue a Master’s degree in Speech Communication, with an emphasis in Intercultural Communication, from Portland State University. Her thesis was titled: “Toward a Phenomenological-Based Perspective of Acculturation with Application to Scottish Immigrants.” 

    Dorothy and Janet Bennett

    Dorothy continued her teaching career at the college level, serving at Portland Community College, Linfield College, Marylhurst University, Lesley College, and Portland State University in the Communication Department. While at Portland State she also served as a dedicated union representative advocating for faculty rights, was involved with Intercultural Communication Workshop (ICW) classes, the Training and Development Program (T&D 1998—2008), and various student exchange programs. She also taught for many years at the Summer Institute for Intercultural Communication (SIIC, 1991-2012), at a conference hosted by the Intercultural Communication Institute (ICI), as well as using her singing talents to entertain attendees during the opening, closing ceremonies and/or various other SIIC events (1987-2018). During her tenure at SIIC, she co-taught many workshops including: Using the Intercultural Perspective; Applying the Intercultural Perspective; Best Practices of Intercultural Communication; and Borders, Boundaries, Belonging and Beyond. Dorothy founded Intercultural Communication Solutions (ICS) and consulted for a variety of institutions during the 1990s and well into the 2000s working with multiple companies helping them with global teaming and communication. One of those was PGE, which had been owned by a Scottish firm for about 10 years, where she helped with that transition and the communication internationally. 

    An accomplished opera singer, Dorothy performed widely, including appearances on BBC radio and television, the Edinburgh International Music Festival, Royal Festival Hall, Albert Hall, Menlo Guild Players, Pacific Opera Theatre, Golden Gate Opera Arts, Coastside Chorale, San Mateo Chorale Society, Scottish Rite Temple, and Bach Dancing and Dynamite Society. She also shared her love of Scottish folk songs and Robert Burns at many Highland Games and Burns Night celebrations.

    Dorothy is survived by her beloved husband, Hap; her daughters, Luisa and Amanda; and her granddaughters, Samantha, Isabella, and Sarah. She is sorely missed, “Till a’ the seas gang dry, our dear.”

    Remembrance article by Sandra Garrison

  • October 16, 2025 4:55 PM | Rob Pusch

    Brianna Harrison, Conference Communications ChairBy Brianna Harrison,
    Conference Communications Chair

    Interculturalism, diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and belonging all flow through us. We hope it can flow from us as well. Though we all strive for a world where we can get along, be civil, and support each other, this work – our work – seems to be constantly under attack. Organizations and institutions continue to roll back diversity and equity programs. Inclusive language is quietly being scrubbed from websites and mission statements. People who think they have all the answers believe that interculturalism is an inconsequential part of life at best, downright harmful at worst. Us-vs-Them mentality runs rampant through our communities. So, what can we do? 

    We keep doing our work. And we support each other as we do our work. There is only so much we can do on our own. We cannot save the world as individuals, and we need to be refilled and reenergized as we pour out so much of ourselves into what we do. We need a network and community of people who believe that the world can be better to lift us up so that we can each do our part. We seek out strategies and resources to help overcome the roadblocks we encounter, and we share those strategies and resources with others in our fields. Gradually, we help people see the beauty and value of interculturalism and inclusion. We help others learn to work together and thrive in multicultural environments. It is what we love to do, and it is what we believe in. Through our unity, unity spreads throughout the world. That is worth the effort.

    The SIETAR USA conference helps us in these endeavors to learn from each other and pour into each other. This year, we will learn new intercultural models, discuss how to leverage social media in our work, reflect on inclusivity, and much more. We will honor the legacies of past voices in interculturalism, hear the wisdom of seasoned interculturalists, and help each other to heal through these difficult times. Through workshops, presentations, reunions, and dinners this conference is sure to strengthen you. No matter what you need in your career or life journey, the conference has something for all of us. It is an opportunity to come together and find joy in each other, and to recommit to the work that we love to do.

    We at SIETAR USA would love to see you at the 2025 conference. Come network, fellowship, learn, and grow with us. As we address many of the world’s problems without wallowing on them, let’s lean on each other and find joy. We are looking forward to the best conference yet!

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. SIETAR USA is a 501(c)(3) organization. Tax ID 01-0532058

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software